Democratic congressman SUES Trump accusing him of inciting MAGA riot

Senior Democratic congressman SUES Donald Trump accusing him of inciting the January 6 MAGA riot, using anti-KKK legislation to go after him and Rudy Giuliani

  • House Homeland Security Committee Chairman, 대표. Bennie Thompson, sued President Donald Trump in federate court Tuesday
  • Thompson accused Trump of inciting an insurrection at the Capitol
  • And Thompson said Trump conspired with his lawyer and extremist groups to prevent the Senate from certifying the election he lost to President Joe Biden
  • The case also names as defendants the Republican former president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and groups including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers
  • The suit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act
  • The act prohibits violence or intimidation meant to prevent Congress or other federal officials from carrying out their constitutional duties
  • A Democratic congressman accused Donald Trump in a federal lawsuit on Tuesday of inciting the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and of conspiring with his lawyer and extremist groups to try to prevent the Senate from certifying the results of the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden.

    The lawsuit from Mississippi’s Rep. Bennie Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is part of an expected wave of litigation over the Jan. 6 riot and is believed to be the first filed by a member of Congress.

    It seeks unspecified punitive and compensatory damages.

    The case also names as defendants the Republican former president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and groups including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, extremist organizations that had members charged by the Justice Department with taking part in the siege.

    Lawyers for Trump have denied that he incited the riot. A Trump adviser didn’t immediately comment about the lawsuit on Tuesday, and a lawyer for Giuliani did not immediately return an email seeking comment.

    The suit, filed in federal court in Washington under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, comes three days after Trump was acquitted in a Senate impeachment trial that centered on allegations that he incited the riot, in which five people died.

    The act was passed in response to KKK violence and prohibits violence or intimidation meant to prevent Congress or other federal officials from carrying out their constitutional duties.

    대표. Bennie Thompson has sued former President Donald Trump, alleging Trump incited the deadly insurrection at the U.S. 국회 의사당. The lawsuit in Washington's federal court alleges the Republican former president conspired with members of far-right extremist groups to prevent the Senate from certifying the results of the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden

    대표. Bennie Thompson has sued former President Donald Trump, alleging Trump incited the deadly insurrection at the U.S. 국회 의사당. The lawsuit in Washington’s federal court alleges the Republican former president conspired with members of far-right extremist groups to prevent the Senate from certifying the results of the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden

    도널드 트럼프 전 대통령, seen on President Joe Biden's inauguration day giving an address at Joint Base Andrews, is being sued by House Homeland Security Committee chairman, 대표. Benny Thompson, under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act

    도널드 트럼프 전 대통령, seen on President Joe Biden’s inauguration day giving an address at Joint Base Andrews, is being sued by House Homeland Security Committee chairman, 대표. Benny Thompson, under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act

    WHAT DOES THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT SAY?

    ‘If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, 위협, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, 믿음, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties.

    광고

    That acquittal is likely to open the door to fresh legal scrutiny over Trump’s actions before and during the siege.

    Even some Republicans who voted to acquit Trump on Saturday acknowledged that the more proper venue to deal with Trump was in the courts, especially now that he has left the White House and lost certain legal protections that shielded him as president.

    The suit traces the drawn-out effort by Trump and Giuliani to cast doubt on the election results even though courts across the country, and state election officials, repeatedly rejected their baseless allegations of fraud. Despite evidence to the contrary, 소송은 말한다, the men portrayed the election as stolen while Trump ‘endorsed rather than discouragedthreats of violence from his angry supporters in the weeks leading up to the assault on the Capitol.

    ‘The carefully orchestrated series of events that unfolded at the Save America rally and the storming of the Capitol was no accident or coincidence,’ 소송은 말한다. ‘It was the intended and foreseeable culmination of a carefully coordinated campaign to interfere with the legal process required to confirm the tally of votes cast in the Electoral College.

    Presidents are historically afforded broad immunity from lawsuits for actions they take in their role as commander in chief.

    But the lawsuit filed Tuesday was brought against Trump in his personal, not official, capacity and alleges that none of the behavior at issue had to do with his responsibilities as president.

    ‘Inciting a riot, or attempting to interfere with the congressional efforts to ratify the results of the election that are commended by the Constitution, could not conceivably be within the scope of ordinary responsibilities of the president,’ Joseph Sellers, a Washington lawyer who along with the NAACP filed the lawsuit on Thompson’s behalf, said in an interview.

    ‘In this respect, because of his conduct, he is just like any other private citizen,’ 판매자 말했다.

    Though the impeachment case focused squarely on accusations of incitement, the lawsuit more broadly accuses Trump of conspiring to disrupt the constitutional activities of Congressnamely, the certification of election results establishing Biden as the rightful winnerthrough a monthslong effort to discredit the outcome and to lean on individual states and his own vice president to overturn the contest.

    The case against Trump was brought under a provision of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

    ‘Fortunately, this hasn’t been used very much,’ 판매자 말했다. ‘But what we see here is so unprecedented that it’s really reminiscent of what gave rise to the enactment of this legislation right after the Civil War.

    The suit cites incendiary comments that Trump and Giuliani made in the weeks leading up to the riot and on the day of it that lawyers say were designed to mobilize supporters to work to overturn the election results and to prevent the Senate’s certification process.

    That process was temporarily interrupted when Trump loyalists broke into the Capitol.

    Trump told supporters at a rally preceding the riot to ‘fight like hell,’ but lawyers for the former president adamantly denied during the impeachment trial that he had incited the riot.

    They pointed to a remark during his speech in which he told the crowd to behave ‘peacefully’ 그 날.

    Defense lawyers are likely to revisit those assertions in the lawsuit.

    They may also argue, as was done during the impeachment case, that Trump’s speech was protected by the First Amendment.

    Trump is headed into a storm of legal trouble just weeks after leaving office.

    Beyond the Thompson lawsuit, Reuters reported earlier this month that criminal and civil investigations into Trump’s businesses are accelerating in New York.

    Manhattan prosecutors looking to see if Trump participated in insurance or tax fraud as part of his real estate business have interviewed witnesses in recent months and hired forensic accountants, Reuters said.

    The Supreme Court will decide if Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance is able to obtain eight years of Trump’s tax records from the accounting firm Mazars.

    As candidate and president, Trump broke precedent and refused to publicly release his tax returns, explaining he wasn’t doing so because they were under ‘audit.

    In the lower courts, Trump’s lawyers have argued, 실패, that the tax return requests amount to political ‘harassment.

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who voted alongside a majority of Republicans for Trump’s acquittal, pointed out in a floor speech after Saturday’s vote that the ex-president could still be in legal jeopardy.

    ‘President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office,’ McConnell said in Senate floor remarks.

    ‘He didn’t get away with anything, 아직,’ 그는 계속했다. ‘We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one.

    댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..