Engineer claims to have figured out where MH370 crashed into the ocean

Engineer claims to have figured out where doomed plane MH370 crashed into the ocean after disappearing with 239 people on board – and that searches missed it by just 28km

  • Aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey claims he has located where MH370 lies 
  • He used novel technology called weak signal propagation previously unused 
  • Wreckage of the plane which vanished in 2014 with 239 aboard was never found 
  • The spot is just 28km from where a US vessel previously searched in 2018 
  • An aerospace engineer claims he has pinpointed the exact location where Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 crashed into the ocean using new technology.

    British expert Richard Godfrey claims the plane hit the ocean 1,993km west of Perth and lies 4,000m below the surface on the ocean floor. 

    The plane vanished on March 8, 2014, with 239 people on board. The wreckage has never been found despite a four-year, $200million international search effort covering more than 120,000sqm – sparking an enduring mystery. 

    Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured with meat and a cleaver) was the pilot-in-command when the plane carrying 238 other passengers and crew vanished on March 8, 2014

    Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured with meat and a cleaver) was the pilot-in-command when the plane carrying 238 other passengers and crew vanished on March 8, 2014

    Mr Godfrey claims the plane is located on the ocean floor in an area at the base of the Broken Ridge underwater plateau (pictured)

    Mr Godfrey claims the plane is located on the ocean floor in an area at the base of the Broken Ridge underwater plateau (pictured) 

    Mr Godfrey claims a previous search missed the crash site by just 28km and hopes his report released on Tuesday will prompt a new hunt next year. 

    The location is in the same area where University of Western Australia head of oceanography Professor Charitha Pattiaratchi also claims the plane rests. 

    He employed a new technology called weak signal propagation, originally developed for digital radio, which he describes as a ‘bunch of tripwires that work in every direction over the horizon to the other side of the globe’. 

    As planes fly through these ‘tripwires’ the signal is disrupted. 

    He tested this method using several ‘blind’ flights that were not tracked in the usual way and claims the data accurately tracked the flight paths. 

    MH370 also had a satellite communications system using British Inmarsat satellites that tracked the location of the plane every hour. 

    A Boeing 777 flaperon cut down to match the one from flight MH370 found on Reunion island off the coast of Africa in 2015, is lowered into water to discover its drift characteristics

    A Boeing 777 flaperon cut down to match the one from flight MH370 found on Reunion island off the coast of Africa in 2015, is lowered into water to discover its drift characteristics

    Mr Godfrey said the two technologies, when used together, can provide ‘a good result’ in tracking a plane.  

    ‘Together the two systems can be used to detect, identify and localise MH370 during its flight path into the Southern Indian Ocean,’ he said.

    He claims the plane would be located on or near the last satellite ping, which can be backed up and refined by the weak signal propagation data. 

    According to his report, the aircraft crashed about a minute after the final satellite link-up at 8.19am over the Indian Ocean and the plane rests at the base of Broken Ridge – an oceanic plateau in an area filled with ravines and an underwater volcano.

    This location 33.177°S 95.300°E was not in the original search area defined by the Australian Transport Seafety Bureau in 2015.

    But it is at the northern part of the 2016 extended 120,000sq km search area. 

    A search in 2018 by the US run Ocean Infinity missed the location by just 28km.

    A graphic showing the flight path of the plane, and where it is thought to have disappeared

    A graphic showing the flight path of the plane, and where it is thought to have disappeared

    Researchers at Cardiff University have analysed the data that sound recorders (station HA01 and HA08) picked up on the night of the crash and suggested two new possible crash routes - one towards the west of Australia (route one) and one towards Madagascar (route two)

    Researchers at Cardiff University have analysed the data that sound recorders (station HA01 and HA08) picked up on the night of the crash and suggested two new possible crash routes – one towards the west of Australia (route one) and one towards Madagascar (route two)

    He said this location also fits with existing information such as other satellite data, aircraft engineering specifications, the weather, and where the 33 pieces of debris recovered from the plane were found. 

    They mystery has sparked a raft of speculation and conspiracy theories. 

    After the plane disappeared, Malaysian investigators publicly gave Captain Zaharie Shah the all-clear. 

    The search efforts focused on areas where a ‘ghost plane’ – which continues flying without anyone able to control it – could have reached before running out of fuel and falling back to earth.

    The search following the plane’s possible trajectory based upon the understanding the pilots were dead – or somehow incapacitated – before the plane crashed.

    Under that scenario, the plane would have continued on its set path, but deliberate action by a pilot to crash the aircraft meant it could have come down far outside the areas that had been searched up to this point. 

    But former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott in early 2020 claimed Malaysia secretly concluded that the pilot at the helm of doomed flight MH370 deliberately crashed the plane. 

    Mr Abbott sensationally claimed he was told by those at the ‘very top levels’ of the Malaysian Government just days after the tragedy that this was the leading theory.  

    Publicly, the Malaysian Government’s investigation remained inconclusive, but privately, Mr Abbott claimed those at the top knew the true explanation within a week of its disappearance, but said search teams were never informed. 

    Catherine Gang, whose husband Li Zhi was on board the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, holds a banner as she walks outside Yonghegong Lama Temple after a gathering of family members of the missing passengers in Beijing, on March 8, 2015

    Catherine Gang, whose husband Li Zhi was on board the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, holds a banner as she walks outside Yonghegong Lama Temple after a gathering of family members of the missing passengers in Beijing, on March 8, 2015

    ‘My very clear understanding, from the very top levels of the Malaysian government is that from very, very early on, they thought it was murder-suicide by the pilot,’ Mr Abbott told a Sky News documentary. 

    Mr Abbott called for a new search to be conducted for the plane saying if there were areas not previously search because teams were working under the assumption the pilot did not deliberately down the aircraft. 

    ‘If there is any part of that ocean that could have been reached on that basis that has not yet been explored, let’s get out and explore it,’ he said. 

    Other ideas that floated at the time included a hijacking attempt, an on-board fire or catastrophic engine failure, but those theories have raised questions as to why a distress signal was never sent. 

    WHAT HAPPENED TO MH370? SOME OF THE THEORIES INTO THE MYSTERY EXAMINED

    Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured) was the pilot of the doomed flight

    Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured) was the pilot of the doomed flight

    DID THE PILOT HIJACK HIS OWN PLANE? 

    Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah planned mass murder because of personal problems, locking his co-pilot out of the cockpit, closing down all communications, depressurising the main cabin and then disabling the aircraft so that it continued flying on auto-pilot until it ran out of fuel.

    That was the popular theory in the weeks after the plane’s disappearance. 

    His personal problems, rumours in Kuala Lumpur said, included a split with his wife Fizah Khan, and his fury that a relative, opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, had been given a five-year jail sentence for sodomy shortly before he boarded the plane for the flight to Beijing.

    But the pilot’s wife angrily denied any personal problems and other family members and his friends said he was a devoted family man and loved his job.

    This theory was also the conclusion of the first independent study into the disaster by the New Zealand-based air accident investigator, Ewan Wilson.

    Wilson, the founder of Kiwi Airlines and a commercial pilot himself, arrived at the shocking conclusion after considering ‘every conceivable alternative scenario’.

    However, he has not been able to provide any conclusive evidence to support his theory.

    The claims are made in the book ‘Goodnight Malaysian 370’, which Wilson co-wrote with the New Zealand broadsheet journalist, Geoff Taylor.

    It’s also been rumoured that Zaharie used a flight simulator at his home to plot a path to a remote island.

    However, officials in Kuala Lumpur declared that Malaysian police and the FBI’s technical experts had found nothing to suggest he was planning to hijack the flight after closely examining his flight simulator. 

    And there are also theories that the tragic disappearance may have been a heroic act of sacrifice by the pilot.

    Australian aviation enthusiast Michael Gilbert believes the doomed plane caught fire mid-flight, forcing the pilot to plot a course away from heavily populated areas. 

    IF NOT THE PILOT, WAS THE CO-PILOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MYSTERY?

    Co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27, again for personal problems, was suspected by rumour-spreaders to have overpowered the pilot and disabled the aircraft, flying it to its doom with crew and passengers unable to get through the locked cockpit door.

    Theorists have put forward the suggestion that he was having relationship problems and this was his dramatic way of taking his own life.

    But he was engaged to be married to Captain Nadira Ramli, 26, a fellow pilot from another airline, and loved his job. There are no known reasons for him to have taken any fatal action.

    There have been a series of outlandish theories about the disappearance of the plane

    There have been a series of outlandish theories about the disappearance of the plane

    Others have suggested that because he was known to have occasionally invited young women into the cockpit during a flight, he had done so this time and something had gone wrong.

    Young Jonti Roos said in March that she spent an entire flight in 2011 in the cockpit being entertained by Hamid, who was smoking.

    Interest in the co-pilot was renewed when it was revealed he was the last person to communicate from the cockpit after the communication system was cut off. 

    DID THE RUSSIANS STEAL MH370 AND FLY THE JET TO KAZAKHSTAN

    An expert has claimed the missing Malaysia Airlines flight 370 was hijacked on the orders of Vladimir Putin and secretly landed in Kazakhstan.

    Jeff Wise, a U.S. science writer who spearheaded CNN’s coverage of the Boeing 777-200E, has based his outlandish theory on pings that the plane gave off for seven hours after it went missing, that were recorded by British telecommunications company Inmarsat.

    Wise believes that hijackers ‘spoofed’ the plane’s navigation data to make it seem like it went in another direction, but flew it to the Baikonur Cosmodrome, which is leased from Kazakhstan by Russia.

    However, Wise admits in New York Magazine that he does not know why Vladimir Putin would want to steal a plane full of people and that his idea is somewhat ‘crazy’.

    Wise also noted there were three Russian men onboard the flight, two of them Ukrainian passport holders.

    Aviation disaster experts analysed satellite data and discovered – like the data recorded by Inmarsat – that the plane flew on for hours after losing contact.

    Careful examination of the evidence has revealed that MH370 made three turns after the last radio call, first a turn to the left, then two more, taking the plane west, then south towards Antarctica.

    MH370 WAS USED BY TERRORISTS FOR A SUICIDE ATTACK ON THE CHINESE NAVY

    This extraordinary claim came from 41-year-old British yachtsman Katherine Tee, from Liverpool, whose initial account of seeing what she thought was a burning plane in the night sky made headlines around the world.

    On arrival in Thailand’s Phuket after sailing across the Indian Ocean from Cochin, southern India with her husband, she said: ‘I could see the outline of the plane – it looked longer than planes usually do.There was what appeared to be black smoke streaming from behind.’

    Ms Tee’s general description of the time and place was vague and she lost all credibility when she later stated on her blog that she believed MH370 was a kamikaze plane that was aimed at a flotilla of Chinese ships and it was shot down before it could smash into the vessels.

    Without solid proof of the satellite data, she wrote on her blog, Saucy Sailoress, the plane she saw was flying at low altitude towards the military convoy she and her husband had seen on recent nights. She added that internet research showed a Chinese flotilla was in the area at the time.

    While the debris proved the plane went down in the Indian Ocean, the location of the main underwater wreckage — and its crucial black box data recorders — remains stubbornly elusive. 

    While the debris proved the plane went down in the Indian Ocean, the location of the main underwater wreckage — and its crucial black box data recorders — remains stubbornly elusive. 

    THE JET LANDED ON THE WATER AND WAS SEEN FLOATING ON THE ANDAMAN SEA  

    On a flight from Jeddah to Kuala Lumpur that crossed over the Andaman Sea on March 8, Malaysian woman Raja Dalelah, 53, saw what she believed was a plane sitting on the water’s surface.

    She didn’t know about the search that had been started for MH370. She alerted a stewardess who told her to go back to sleep.

    ‘I was shocked to see what looked like the tail and wing of an aircraft on the water,’ she said.

    It was only when she told her friends on landing in Kuala Lumpur what she had seen that she learned of the missing jet. She had seen the object at about 2.30pm Malaysian time.

    She said she had been able to identify several ships and islands before noticing the silver object that she said was a plane.

    But her story was laughed off by pilots who said it would have been impossible to have seen part of an aircraft in the water from 35,000ft or seven miles.

    Ms Raja filed an official report with police the same day and has kept to her story.

    ‘I know what I saw,’ she said.

    THE AIRCRAFT SUFFERED A CATASTROPHIC SYSTEMS FAILURE AND CRASH-LANDED ON THE OCEAN

    A catastrophic event such as a fire disabling much of the equipment resulted in the pilots turning the plane back towards the Malaysian peninsula in the hope of landing at the nearest airport.

    Satellite data, believable or not, suggests the aircraft did make a turn and theorists say there would be no reason for the pilots to change course unless confronted with an emergency.

    A fire in a similar Boeing 777 jet parked at Cairo airport in 2011 was found to have been caused by a problem with the first officer’s oxygen mask supply tubing.

    Stewarts Law, which has litigated in a series of recent air disasters, believes the plane crashed after a fire – similar to the blaze on the Cairo airport runway – broke out in the cockpit.

    After an investigation into the Cairo blaze, Egypt’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Central Directorate (EAAICD) released their final report which revealed that the fire originated near the first officer’s oxygen mask supply tubing.

    The cause of the fire could not be conclusively determined, but investigators pinpointed a problem with the cockpit hose used to provide oxygen for the crew in the event of decompression.

    Following the 2011 fire, US aircraft owners were instructed to replace the system – it was estimated to cost $2,596 (£1,573) per aircraft. It was not known whether Malaysia Airlines had carried out the change.

    If either pilot wanted to crash the plane, why turn it around? So the turn-around suggests they were trying to land as soon as possible because of an emergency.

    THE US SHOT DOWN THE AIRCRAFT FEARING A TERROR ATTACK ON DIEGO GARCIA  

    The Boeing 777 was shot down by the Americans who feared the aircraft had been hijacked and was about to be used to attack the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian Ocean. So conspiracy theorists claim.

    And former French airline director Marc Dugain said he had been warned by British intelligence that he was taking risks by investigating this angle.

    There is no way of checking whether Dugain received such a warning or why he believes the Americans shot down the plane.

    But adding to the theory that the aircraft was flown to Diego Garcia, either by the pilot Zaharie or a hijacker, was the claim that on the pilot’s home flight simulator was a ‘practice’ flight to the island.

    Professor Glees said: ‘The Americans would have no interest in doing anything of the kind and not telling the world.

    ‘In theory, they might wish to shoot down a plane they thought was attacking them but they wouldn’t just fire missiles, they’d investigate it first with fighters and would quickly realise that even if it had to be shot down, the world would need to know.’

    Mr Rosenschein said: ‘The U.S. would not have been able to hide this fact and in any event, if it were true, they would have admitted their action as it would have prevented a successful terrorist action on this occasion and acted as a deterrent for future terrorist attacks.’ 

    Advertisement

    Comments are closed.