‘Arrogant’ pa-van-twee, 71, who ‘murdered’ a protected tree and then ‘lied through his teeth’ because it stood in the way of a £100,000 property deal faces unlimited fine after being found guilty of killing historic pine
An ‘arrogant’ homeowner who killed a protected tree because it threatened to scupper a £100,000 property deal faces a huge fine after he lied about its demise.
Robert Page, 71, was told by a judge that he had ‘murdered’ the 65-foot-tall mature Monterey pine and ‘lied through his teeth’ when planning officers questioned how the tree had been poisoned.
A jury heard that Page wanted rid of the 65-year-old specimen from the front garden of his £900,000 home near Poole Harbour, Dorset, as it stood in the way of a lucrative property deal.
Photos shows the dead and leafless tree either collapsed or cut down and felled onto garages behind Page’s home.
The retired chartered accountant had agreed to sell his large detached home to a developer who wanted to demolish it and build a block of luxury flats.
Robert Page, 71, was described as ‘arrogant’ by a judge after he was found guilty of ‘murdering’ a 65-foot-tall mature Monterey pine at his Poole Harbour, Dorset home before ‘lying through his teeth’ over its demise. Op die foto: Page leaving Salisbury Law Courts
A jury heard that Page wanted rid of the 65-year-old specimen from the front garden of his £900,000 home near Poole Harbour, Dorset, as it stood in the way of a lucrative property deal
Page’s grand plan fell through when planning permission was refused. But soon after the decision, the tree began to wither and die. Op die foto: The property after the tree died from poisoning
The court heard the pensioner stood to make £100,000 from the sale.
The court was also told that the tree cast a shadow over his south-facing house and that was another reason he wanted it gone.
But his grand plan fell through when planning permission was refused. The public amenity value of the evergreen, that was protected by a Tree Preservation Order, was cited as one of the reasons for refusal.
Page then applied to have the tree legally felled, claiming that it was a danger, and this was also refused.
Tree experts found a deadly herbicide had been injected into drill holes and cement poured around its base to choke it of oxygen. Op die foto: The tree after it was poisoned and killed by Page
Pictures show the tree either collapsed or cut down and felled onto garages behind Page’s £900,000 home
Kort daarna, the luscious pine, which had decades of natural life ahead of it, began to wither and die.
A tree expert from the local council inspected the dying tree and discovered it had been sabotaged. A deadly herbicide had been injected into drill holes and cement poured around its base to choke it of oxygen.
Page returned home from a bike ride with his financial advisor wife and was overheard to tell her ‘don’t tell them anything’ upon seeing the expert on his property, het die hof gehoor.
The pensioner denied a charge of breaching a TPO order with intent to destroy the tree, claiming that somebody else must have come onto his property and killed it.
But he was found guilty following a four day trial at Salisbury Crown Court, Wiltshire.
Page returned home from a bike ride with his financial advisor wife and was overheard to tell her ‘don’t tell them anything’ upon seeing the expert on his property, het die hof gehoor. Op die foto: The stump left behind in the garden of the house in Poole, Dorset, after the decades-old tree was felled
Judge Robert Pawson adjourned the case for sentencing but not before tearing into the defendant.
Hy het gesê: ‘You deliberately decided to get rid of that tree, whether it was a thorn in the side of the planning officers and you were hoping for another deal with the developers.
‘You sat there and lied through your teeth. It displays a certain arrogance.’
The maximum sentence for the crime is an unlimited fine. Page also faces paying expensive court costs as well.
Judge Pawson added: ‘You are certainly entitled to a fair trial but it costs money and that is going to end up at your door.’
He also described the case as a ‘murder trial of a tree’.
The court heard that the ‘huge and historic’ pine tree was made subject to a TPO in 1989 – 17 years before Page brought the house in the affluent Lilliput area of Poole.
Page faces an unlimited fine for breaching a TPO order with intent to destroy the tree. Op die foto: Salisbury Law Courts, where Mr Page is currently standing trial
Nick Cotter, vervolging, told the jury during the trial that the two applications to remove the tree were lodged with the then Poole Borough Council in 2015 en 2016. Deur 2016 the tree was dead.
Mr Cotter said: ‘The expert evidence is incontrovertible. The tree was clearly damaged in a sophisticated way to kill it.
‘I do not have Mr Page holding a hatchet but it does not mean there is no evidence to suggest that he did it.
‘When you start placing the evidence together it becomes like dead wood on the shoulders of Mr Page, weighing him down.
‘We have a history with this tree linked indelibly to Mr Page.
‘We have two applications in 2015 to renovate the property and sell it to make £100,000 profit – a motivation to get rid of the tree.
‘It was raised as one of the reasons why those applications did not work. He had his focus on the tree from 2015 Voorwaarts.
‘We know it was on his mind in 2016 – we have the application to take it down.
‘His case is that someone came there when nobody was around and managed to chop away some wood on one occasion and on another occasion came back again to chop some more. This tree fiddler then covered the damage.
‘They did all that secretly and silently over a couple of months and nobody spotted anything.
‘The evidence all points to Mr Page and his actions have led very sadly to the death of this tree.’
Bladsy, a father-of-two, will be sentenced later this month.