Homeowner, 68, accused of 'killing historic tree' near his property

Luxury homeowner, 68, ‘killed historic tree which blocked the sun from his £900,000 Dorset property’ ‘chokingit to death with concrete and herbicide after he failed to secure permission to remove it legally, 법원이 듣는다

  • Robert Page, 68, is accused of poisoning a mature pine tree in Poole, 도싯
  • The tree blocked the sun from his £900,000 luxury home in an upmarket area
  • 중에서 2015 과 2018, Mr Page applied several times for the council to chop it
  • 에 2018, the tree began to wither and die; and council were told it would be felled
  • Local authority sent along a tree expert, who says he found evidence of poison
  • A luxury homeowner accused of poisoning a protected tree because it blocked sunlight from his property, sabotaged it using herbicide and concrete, 법원이 들었다.

    Robert Page, 68, allegedly plotted to get rid of the 65ft Monterey pine in the front garden of his £900,000 home near Poole Harbour, 도싯, after several failed applications to the local authority to fell it, forcing it to be chopped down.

    The ‘huge and historicspecimen was protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and had stood in the upmarket neighbourhood of Lilliput since the early 1950s.

    Mr Page is now standing trial at Salisbury Crown Court, where he has pleaded not guilty to all charges of breaching a Tree Preservation Order with intent to destroy the tree.

    Robert Page, 68, leaving Salisbury Law Courts, where he is standing trial accused of killing a decades-old pine tree which blocked the sun from his £900,000 home

    Robert Page, 68, leaving Salisbury Law Courts, where he is standing trial accused of killing a decades-old pine tree which blocked the sun from his £900,000 home

    The tree pictured in 2019 towered above houses in the Sandbanks area
    The tree left a noticeable absence after it was felled
    나를 밀어

    Before and after: The tree in question (왼쪽 그림 2019 그리고 바로 2021) 였다 65 years old and towered above houses in the upmarket Sandbanks area

    에서 2015, Mr Page applied to the local council for consent to have it removed. After the last application was refused in 2018, the evergreen began to wither and die despite having decades of natural life ahead of it, a jury heard.

    A landscape gardener employed by Mr Page emailed the town hall informing them he would be removing the mature tree which was ‘dying and weeks from death’.

    The message prompted a tree officer to visit the detached house that is close to the exclusive Sandbanks area to inspect the tree.

    The court heard that the expert discovered it had been sabotaged.

    It is claimed Mr Page sought to remove the tree as it blocked sunlight from his luxury £900,000 property

    It is claimed Mr Page sought to remove the tree as it blocked sunlight from his luxury £900,000 property

    Holes had been drilled into the trunk and a herbicide poured inside and concrete tipped around the base to remove oxygen from the roots, ‘chokingthe Monterey pine.

    The culprit also ‘ring barkedthe tree meaning they cut out a section of bark to prevent it from absorbing nutrients.

    A jury heard that when Mr Page and his financial advisor wife Nicola returned home from a bike ride to find the tree expert there, he was overheard telling her ‘don’t tell them anything’.

    The stump left behind in the garden of the house in Poole, 도싯, after the decades-old tree was felled

    The stump left behind in the garden of the house in Poole, 도싯, after the decades-old tree was felled

    Nick Cotter, 기소, told Salisbury Crown Court that Mr Page ‘permittedthe tree to be destroyed as its large canopy overshadowed his south-facing home.

    Mr Cotter said: ‘It was a huge historic Monterey pine protected by law. It was at least 64 years of age and was planted in the early 1950s.

    ‘It stands within the grounds of the defendant’s property at 26 Avalon, a road made up of mainly large, detached homes. The beach at Sandbanks is just a short walk away.

    ‘It covers a large portion of the front of his home and its foliage provides a lot of shade. It can be seen from some distance away. It is an important feature of the local landscape.

    ‘It was still in the early stages of its natural life spanthey do not reach their full size until they are roughly 80 ...에 100 살이에요.

    ‘The TPO was made in 1989 – long before Mr Page moved to the property in 2006. It applies to many of the trees in the Sandbanks and Poole area.

    Mr Cotter told the court that the local council was first made aware that the tree was dying in June 2018.

    Mr Page denies charges of breaching a Tree Preservation Order with intent to destroy the tree.

    Mr Page denies charges of breaching a Tree Preservation Order with intent to destroy the tree.

    Tree officer James Roberts discovered it had been killed ‘deliberately.

    Mr Cotter said: ‘Concrete had been placed at the base of the tree above the root structurethis removes oxygen from the root collar and suffocates it. It also prevents the roots from taking in water.

    ‘There was also evidence of ring-barking which has no other purpose than to destroy the treebark is like the veins of the tree. Removing it will have an impact on the tree’s ability to take in nutrients.

    ‘Holes were drilled into the tree and thereafter the tree was injected with glyphosate, a herbicide.

    ‘The defendant appeared and denied any knowledge of the damage to the tree.

    He read out a statement made by Mr Page to council officers after they discovered the apparent sabotage to the tree.

    Salisbury Law Courts, where Mr Page is currently standing trial

    Salisbury Law Courts, where Mr Page is currently standing trial

    He explained that a landscaper, employed by Mr Page, had applied to remove the tree three years previously, claiming it was ‘decaying and posed a threat to life for local residents.

    Mr Cotter said: ‘There have been applications since 2015 which were refused because of this treein all of them, it is commented on as being of public amenity-valueand not in any way decaying or dying. Thereafter it does begin to die.

    In evidence, Mr Roberts told the court the pine was in ‘substantial declineand had lost its green colour.

    Mr Page denied all knowledge of damage being done to the tree and said the planning application was made because the ‘severe lean of it could damage residents and cause loss of life.

    Convictions for breaching a Tree Preservation Order can result in a fines of thousands of pounds. It can also open the door for local authorities to prosecute under the Proceeds of Crime Act, allowing them to seize any perceived increase in value to a homeowner’s property from felling a protected tree.

    재판은 계속됩니다.

    댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..