Italy hits Amazon and Apple with £168m antitrust fine for violating EU rules by restricting competition in sale of goods including Beats products
이탈리아‘s competition watchdog has fined Amazon and Apple more than £168 million for entering into a deal to penalise other sellers of Apple products in breach of EU law.
The watchdog ordered Apple to pay £113 million and Amazon £58 million after the tech firm and the e-commerce giant entered into a deal to penalise official and non-official sellers of Apple products.
The agreement also covered Beats by Dre headphones, which are owned by Apple.
The US big tech firms are the latest to fall foul of European fairness rules which has seen firms targeted across a range of issues, from the sale of consumer electronics, to the aggregation of news content on social media platforms.
The watchdog ordered Apple to pay £113 million and Amazon £58 million after the tech firm and the e-commerce giant entered into a deal to penalise official and non-official sellers of Apple products (an iPhone, 권리). The agreement also covered Beats by Dre headphones (왼쪽), which are owned by Apple.
Washington will be watching the developments keenly as American lawmakers are eyeing similar moves to stop Silicon Valley beasts from stifling competition and crushing freedom of speech online.
Both Amazon and Apple said they intended to appeal against the fines levied in Italy.
The Italian watchdog said a 2018 deal between the two US companies had ‘barred official and unofficial resellers of Apple and Beats products from using Amazon.it, allowing the sale of those products in that marketplace only to Amazon and to selected parties in a discriminatory manner’.
The aim had been to restrict the number of retailers and limit cross-border sales, 그것은 말했다.
The agreement spelled bad news for consumers, because at least 70 percent of electronics goods bought in Italy were purchased on Amazon.
‘We strongly disagree with the decision…. and we intend to appeal,’ Amazon said in a statement, adding that the fine was ‘disproportionate and unjustified’.
It said it made no sense to suggest Amazon benefitted ‘by excluding sellers’ because its business model ‘relies on their success’.
In its statement, Apple said it believed ‘we have done nothing wrong’ and the agreement was part of efforts to ensure only genuine products were being sold through reseller partners.
The watchdog said its probe has inspired Germany and Spain antitrust authorities to ‘launch similar procedures’.
A crackdown on big tech firms could lead to the breakup of the largest platforms, with Europe powering ahead with antitrust litigation and US lawmakers eyeing moves to make antitrust enforcement easier.
The Italy fine comes just two weeks after a European Union court rejected a Google appeal against a 2.4-billion-euro antitrust fine.
Giants Google, 사과, 페이스 북, Amazon and Microsoft have been accused of stifling competition, not paying enough taxes, stealing media content and threatening democracy by spreading fake news.
Amazon is owned by Jeff Bezos, the second richest man in the world after Elon Musk
Big Tech critics want Apple and Google to loosen the grip of their online app marketplaces; more competition in a digital advertising market dominated by Google and Facebook; and better access to Amazon’s e-commerce platform by third-party sellers.
In terms of taxation, 이탈리아, 프랑스, Germany and Spain won a major victory in June when the G7 richest nations agreed to a minimum global corporate tax rate for the world’s biggest companies, which include the US tech giants.
거의 140 countries have since backed the 15-percent tax.
The reform seeks to end the practice of big firms such as Apple and Google of sheltering profits in low-tax countries.
The EU has also unveiled plans for mammoth fines of up to 10 percent of sales on tech firms that break competition rules, which could even lead to them being broken up.
Italy’s consumer association Codacons was quick to welcome the fine against Apple and Amazon, saying that ‘any limitation of access to operators on e-commerce platforms represents damage to consumers’.