捕食者がメンバーを懇願するために入札するので、LVはまだ質問に答えることを拒否します

LVがまだ答えることを拒否する質問: Insurer stays silent as private equity predator launches last-ditch bid to win over members

LV chairman Alan Cook opened the bidding process up to a swathe of suitors, and Royal London and Bain were the last two standing

LV chairman Alan Cook opened the bidding process up to a swathe of suitors, and Royal London and Bain were the last two standing

The private equity predator hoping to buy LV has warned members they may get nothing unless they back its £530million takeover.

With just over two weeks to go to secure a deal, US buyout group Bain Capital insisted ‘the values of LV are not going to change’ under its ownership. But it emerged yesterday that LV will be taken over by an offshore firm, based in the tax haven of Jersey, if Bain wins control.

While Jersey has a 0 per cent corporation tax rate and lower requirements on company disclosures, it is understood the new owner of LV will still file UK tax returns and be subject to UK tax. The latest revelation follows weeks of criticism over Bain’s proposals, with critics slamming the ‘paltry’ £100 offered to most LV members to hand over the 178-year-old mutual insurer to private equity.

Bain and LV have also been criticised for a lack of transparency over a host of issues including the fees being paid to advisers, what the deal means for jobs and an alternative offer from fellow mutual Royal London.

Matt Popoli, Bain’s global head of insurance, 前記: ‘Our transaction will result in the highest amount of payout to policyholders – full stop.

‘There is no other proposal that will result in higher payout to policyholders. There have been these catchy headlines.

‘There are a lot of soundbites, だが, if you actually look at what is in the best interest of policyholders, it is really hard to argue that this transaction isn’t in their best interests.’

彼が追加した: ‘Short of our deal I don’t think the members end up getting any kind of payouts.’

LV is currently owned by its policyholders, meaning it is run with only their interests in mind and not to generate cash for a shareholder. They are now being asked to vote on the deal, in a process which will end on December 10.

But a number of key questions remain unanswered – meaning members are voting without all the information they need.

Mutual: LV is currently owned by its policyholders, meaning it is run with only their interests in mind and not to generate cash for a shareholder

Mutual: LV is currently owned by its policyholders, meaning it is run with only their interests in mind and not to generate cash for a shareholder

What would members get under rival offer?

Bain is offering just £100 to most LV members, along with a modest uplift to the final payout for those who hold so-called with-profits policies.

Its latest claim is that policyholders could get nothing if they turn down its deal and that ‘there is no other proposal that will result in higher payout’.

But sources involved in the bidding process for LV suggested this claim was misleading. Other suitors who wanted to buy the insurer – including fellow mutual Royal London –were turned down before they got to the stage where they could start calculating how much members might have been handed.

They said Bain has no way of knowing whether other bids may have resulted in more generous payouts and could not say that its bid certainly offered the best outcome for members.

Why won’t LV engage with Royal London?

LV was in discussions with Royal London about a takeover for around eight years – long before the insurer’s current chief executive Mark Hartigan or chairman Alan Cook joined.

After Cook joined in 2017, he opened the bidding process up to a swathe of suitors, and Royal London and Bain were the last two standing with near-identical bids.

LV bosses said they picked Bain because its offer removed some risks that with-profits members would otherwise have had to bear. Sources close to Royal London said they were willing to offer £10million more than Bain to cover these risks.

But critics have also raised eyebrows at the fact that Bain’s offer will see Hartigan and Cook keep their jobs, which they would have lost under Royal London.

As the backlash against the Bain deal mounted, Royal London urged LV to reopen discussions. It is even willing to construct a deal which would allow LV to remain a mutual.

But so far LV has refused to engage, insisting that Bain’s deal is best.

What does Bain deal mean for Hartigan?

LV has been slammed for repeatedly saying its bosses would not financially benefit from the deal.

Though they will not bank a windfall directly in the takeover, Cook has signed to keep his £205,000-a-year job for at least another two years. Hartigan is likely to be kept on as chief executive, though he has not yet signed a contract.

He has admitted this would be likely to mean a pay rise from the £1.2million he earned last year. Bain could also give him an equity stake in the company, potentially worth millions.

Neither Bain nor LV has been able to provide any transparency on what Hartigan’s future pay deal might look like.

Are jobs safe?

LV has talked down Royal London’s offer by saying it would be likely to involve swathes of job cuts. But it is understood that even under Bain, Hartigan is planning to slash jobs at LV as it invests in technology.

One industry source said it was ‘hard to believe’ that a private equity firm – they are notorious for axing jobs as they attempt to wring businesses for money – would be more generous to workers than a fellow mutual.

What does lv owe advisers in fees?

The bill which LV will have to pay out to its advisers – including investment bank Fenchurch Advisory, City spinners FTI Consulting and law firm Clifford Chance – is likely to hit the tens of millions.

While this is coming out of members’ money, LV has refused to disclose what the total is. It has said it will reveal the sum if the deal with Bain completes, which would be in around a year if it is passed by members.

But by then, it will be far too late to inform policyholders who are still trying to make up their mind over the takeover.

Make your voice heard on LV

We are encouraging LV members, customers, or others, who would like to see it retain its mutual status, rather than be bought out by private equity, to write to it.

You could use the wording from the letter printed in the Daily Mail newspaper’s City pages (ここに描かれています).

We have included the words for you to copy and paste into a letter below.

Send it to Alan Cook, Chairman of LV=, Liverpool Victoria, County Gates, Bournemouth, BH1 2NF

Dear Alan Cook,

私, the undersigned, urge you to reconsider your decision to sell LV= to Bain Capital and instead maintain its mutual status.

コメントは締め切りました.