Benefici cheat è dato 686 anni per rimborsare £ 100.000: Madre di quattro figli, 41, who blew a fortune on five-star holidays while claiming handouts is told to give back just £11 a month
A benefits cheat spared jail despite falsely claiming almost £100,000 has been ordered to refund the taxpayer just £11 a month – meaning it would take her 686 years to pay it all back.
Claire Finney, 41, enjoyed five-star holidays as she pocketed extra child tax credits, universal credit, housing benefit and income support by falsely claiming she was a single parent, un tribunale sentito.
Along with her four children and long-time partner Joseph Perry – who she falsely described in one claim as their grandfather – she enjoyed a string of stays at luxury resorts in Cyprus. Mr Perry was not accused of any wrongdoing.
Claire Finney (nella foto), 41, has been spared jail despite enjoying five-star holidays after falsely claiming almost £100,000 in benefits
Finney faced up to three years in jail after she admitted giving false information to the Department of Work and Pensions and her local council, resulting in a total loss to the taxpayer of £97,028.
Ma, despite having a previous benefit fraud conviction, she walked free from court with a suspended sentence after a judge said it would be her children who suffered if he jailed her.
She is paying back the money at just £11.77 a month – a rate at which she would not cover the full amount until the year 2707.
The rate was agreed with the DWP before the hearing and is understood to be based on her low income.
She made fraudulent claims from addresses in Salford and Eccles in Greater Manchester.
Finney (nella foto) pocketed extra child tax credits, universal credit, housing benefit and income support by falsely claiming she was a single parent, un tribunale sentito
Prosecutor Eleanor Gleeson told Manchester Crown Court she stated in claims between April 2014 e luglio 2019 to be ‘living in those properties alone whilst supporting four children, without employment’.
In realtà, lei disse, her primary address was owned by Mr Perry ‘who was the husband or partner of the defendant throughout the period in question’.
The fraud was only exposed after an anonymous tip-off.
Figures showed Finney made claims totalling £136,168 but was only entitled to just under £39,140.
She admitted her claims were false because Mr Perry continued to live with her. She had also inflated child care costs. It is not known if the couple are still together.
Judge Nicholas Dean QC told Finney: ‘You give those people who legitimately claim benefits a bad name as they are tarred with the same brush as you.’
But he said sending her to prison would be ‘immensely problematic for your children’.
Finney was given 12 months in jail suspended for two years and ordered to complete 180 ore di lavoro non retribuito.