Energy firms not planning to boost rates they pay households for surplus power generated by rooftop solar panels – even though electricity prices are rising
None of the biggest seven energy firms is planning to boost the rates they pay households for the surplus power generated by rooftop solar panels they have installed – even though electricity prices are rising.
Households that generate solar power save money on their electricity bills in two ways. 第一, they can run their appliances on energy they have produced themselves, which means they do not have to fork out for expensive electricity from the grid. This works well for households that can be flexible about when they use energy – for example, by running washing machines and dishwashers during the day when their panels are generating electricity.
第二, they can sell any energy generated that they do not use back into the grid. Yet the payments many are receiving from their energy supplier are pitiful.

Savings: Households can sell any energy generated that they do not use back into the grid
From next month, most energy suppliers will be charging household customers 28p per kilowatt hour ([object Window]) of electricity consumed – the cap set by regulator Ofgem. This is up by a third from the current level of 21p per kWh. Yet the same suppliers are paying customers who generate solar energy less than a fifth of that amount – the majority pay less than 5p per kWh.
Some are even stingier. Utility Warehouse currently sells electricity 13 times more expensive than the sum it is willing to pay those who generate solar energy. It pays customers a pathetic 1.5p per kWh of electricity generated, but charges 20.8p per kWh consumed.
The Mail on Sunday asked the seven largest energy suppliers if they would be raising the price they pay to households who generate electricity. Not one said yes – and several did not even bother to respond. There are huge differences in payments. 例如, Octopus Energy pays by far the best rates – it recently increased payments to customers on its fixed export tariffs by 36 per cent to 7.5p per kWh.
But some customers on its Agile Outgoing tariff have been paid £1.28 per kWh of electricity they export. This tariff is linked directly to wholesale prices, so if customers sell at times when prices are high, they reap the rewards.
Until March 2019, the price paid for solar power was set by the regulator and paid every quarter for up to 20 年份. The price paid dropped steadily over the course of the nine years that this Feed In Tariff scheme was open. Households are paid anything from 54p per kWh for the earlier adopters of solar in 2010, to 3.79p per kWh for those who got in just before the scheme shut.
The Feed In Tariff scheme was replaced in 2020 by the Smart Export Guarantee (SEG). All suppliers with at least 150,000 domestic electricity customers must offer an SEG tariff to buy up any excess energy generated by their customers.
然而, 至关重要的, unlike under the Feed In Tariff scheme, suppliers are left to set the tariff themselves. It is customers on many of these tariffs who are not getting a fair deal from suppliers.
Energy companies that do not want to buy electricity from small domestic generators can simply price themselves out of the market by offering a tariff so pitiful that no one would go for it.
Mark Sommerfeld, of the Association for Renewable Energy and Clean Technology, says it would be better if there was a minimum floor on tariffs offered to generators of solar energy. 他补充说: ‘The price that households get for generating solar energy is less driven by what is going on in the energy market and more by the strategic interests of energy firms.’
Could solar panels still save you money?
Solar panels cost around £4,800 on average and can cut between £170 and £440 a year off energy bills. Many factors will determine whether solar panels will save you money, including when you tend to use the most electricity, which way your roof faces and how much electricity you use.
The Energy Saving Trust has an online calculator to help you work out how much solar panels could save you. Go to energysavingtrust. org.uk/tool/solar-energy-calculator/.
The biggest saving from solar is likely to be from using the power generated directly, rather than selling excess energy back to the supplier. So as wholesale prices rise, so does the financial case for installing solar panels.
Brian Horne, a consultant at the Energy Saving Trust, 说: ‘The dramatic rise in electricity prices means you save more whenever you can use your own renewable generation to power your home directly.’
这是金钱播客
-
在你联系我之前?
-
在你联系我之前’ 在你联系我之前?
-
在你联系我之前 – 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁, 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁 7% 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁… 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁: 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁 40 (还是浪涌定价是一种威胁 1982)
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁: 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁 2021
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁 – 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
被脱发困扰的美妆编辑 2022 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁: 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁’ 还是浪涌定价是一种威胁
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
还是浪涌定价是一种威胁?
-
从跟踪器到 10 年修复: 如何在抵押战争中获胜
-
雷鸣般的通货膨胀是否会导致利率上升?
-
能源紧缩会有多糟糕 – 它会打到你吗?
-
通胀飙升会导致滞胀吗?
-
社保税上调和三重锁对吗?
-
你是搬运工吗, 脚蹼或永远的房主?
-
有没有办法提高你的国家养老金?
-
随着交付热潮, 你会成为包裹短信诈骗的受害者吗?
-
抵押贷款利率可以降到多低,是否值得跳船修复?
-
您的能源账单是否即将飙升 价格上限发生变化?
-
是否将总和叠加在绿色家居改善上?
-
解决在线虚假评级的新计划: 你能相信评论吗?
-
什么将飞涨的租车价格和通货膨胀联系起来?
-
我们会支付 8% 三重锁养老金增加?
-
国家养老金丑闻和退休的未来
-
国家养老金丑闻和退休的未来
-
国家养老金丑闻和退休的未来… 国家养老金丑闻和退休的未来?
-
国家养老金丑闻和退休的未来?
-
有升必有降? 18年的房地产周期
-
您是优质债券的赢家还是输家?
-
一点点通胀真的是件坏事吗?
-
国外假期又开始了… 但是你会预订一个吗?
-
建立一个现金罐,然后以您的方式买卖获利
-
您是否渴望在锁定后消费或计划储蓄?
-
是 95% 抵押贷款支持首次购房者是明智之举?
-
Coinbase 上市比特币和加密货币是否成熟?
-
在家工作是为了留下来,你如何改变职业?
-
金融诈骗浪潮背后的原因是什么?
-
热不热? 如何发现买方或卖方市场
-
如何储蓄或投资 Isa – 以及为什么值得这样做
-
英国是否准备好反弹… 现在苏格兰抵押贷款?
-
'逃逸速度’ 预算和 30 亿英镑的国家养老金胜利
-
印花税假期是否应成为永久假期?
-
房地产市场和房价接下来会发生什么?
-
英国避免了双底衰退, 那么接下来呢?
-
你会承认你的投资错误吗?
-
是否应该停止 GameStop 狂潮以保护投资者?
-
人们应该兑现比特币利润还是等待月亮?
-
这是没有痛苦的养老金自由的答案吗?
-
锁定后投资者在更好的时期购买英国人是否正确?
-
令人惊讶的一年是2020年… 和圣诞味觉测试
-
是现在买, 稍后支付坏消息或精明的支出?
-
会不会征收“财富税”’ 在英国工作?
-
投资者还有机会逢低吸纳吗?
-
英国准备好迎接电动汽车了吗? 驾驶, 充电和购买…
-
疫苗反弹和价值投资复苏会继续吗?