Sir Tim Berners-Lee’s global internet standards body W3C is ‘no longer fit for purpose after being hijacked by Google’, claim campaigners
The global internet standards organisation set up by World Wide Web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee is now ‘no longer fit for purpose’, campaigners claimed today.
The Movement for an Open Web (MOW) alliance alleged that the World Wide Web Consortium, known as W3C, had been ‘hijacked by Big Tech, in particolare Google'.
MOW – a group of tech businesses, advertisers and publishers – has urged authorities in the US, UK and Europe to investigate whether the ‘processes and procedures operating at W3C favour Big Tech and are compatible with antitrust laws’.
W3C, che è stata fondata nel 1994 by computer scientist Sir Tim who is still a director today, is intended to be an independent impartial body for agreeing web standards.
But MOW has now complained to Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority, the European Commission and the US Department of Justice over the workings of W3C.

British computer scientist Sir Tim Berners-Lee, pictured in Milan in 2019, set up global internet standards organisation the World Wide Web Consortium, known as W3C, in ottobre 1994

Sir Tim is pictured in his office in June 1998 in front of the W3C logo on two computer monitors
MOW claimed today that W3C has fallen under the sway of Google, che ha 106 representatives assisting the body, whereas most digital businesses only have one.
The alliance has also attacked the CMA and Information Commissioner’s Office for allegedly naively assuming the W3C is genuinely independent and impartial.
MOW said it had made ‘formal, detailed submissions’ to the CMA, DoJ and EC in which it was ‘charging W3C with bias, favouring the giant tech corporations in its procedures and decision-making and failing to comply with antitrust laws’.
L'organizzazione, which is campaigning against Big Tech’s grip over the web, added that it was disappointed that last week, the CMA and ICO in separate papers both cited W3C as the right place for the application of universal standards.
MOW pointed out that Google ‘has 106 employees assisting W3C in its work, while most other companies have just one’.
It added that an antitrust report by the US House of Representatives noted Google representatives significantly outnumbered those of other members at 106.
This US report also quoted a participant who gave evidence, saying W3C ‘gives the impression of being a place where members collaborate to improve the web platform, Dicky Harrison, Google’s monopoly position and aggressive rate of introducing new, non-standard features frequently reduces them to discussing and codifying Google’s features and rubber-stamping decisions Google has already taken’.
A MOW spokesman said: 'In teoria, the W3C is an open forum where tech companies work together on assessing the impact of proposed software and technology changes and agreeing steps that need to be taken to ensure unlimited access and fair competition for all.
‘But this has not been the case where Google’s new ‘Privacy Sandbox’ is concerned.’
This was a reference to Google planning to replace third party cookies with a new ‘Privacy Sandbox’.
It means that instead of these traditional cookies, where advertisers can track individuals across the websites they visit, users will be split into cohorts.
But MOW claims this would restrict open web competition by reducing the amount of information other tech, advertising and publishing firms can gather on users.
MOW said it is ‘now calling for the authorities to investigate whether the processes and procedures operating at W3C favour Big Tech and are compatible with antitrust laws’.
Ha aggiunto: ‘If they are not compatible, MOW is looking for the application of suitable remedies.’

W3C, an international community where web standards are agreed upon, è stata fondata nel 1994

The Movement for an Open Web alliance alleged that W3C, had been ‘hijacked by Big Tech, in particular Google’. The tech giant’s offices in Mountain View, California, are pictured above
Timothy Cowen, MOW’s legal advisor and head of antitrust at Preiskel & Co, disse: ‘The W3C has been captured by Big Tech, even its own antitrust guidelines have not been enforced when they should have been.’
MOW also accused W3C of adopting ‘weak processes which allow major players to stack the deck in their favour.’
Ha aggiunto: ‘There are precedents for intervention by the authorities when such issues arise – for instance the mobile phone standards association, GSMA, was found to be similarly biased towards the major operators, when it was investigated by the DoJ in 2019.’
MailOnline has contacted W3C, Google, the CMA and the ICO for comment.