Tech group lodges complaint with EU over Google Privacy Sandbox

Tech group lodges formal complaint with EU over Google’s ‘anti-competitivePrivacy Sandbox digital advertising system

  • Movement for an Open Web claims new ad system is hugely anti-competitive
  • ‘Privacy Sandboxwill be an overhaul of how adverts work on Chrome browser
  • Instead of traditional third-party cookies, users would be split into cohorts
  • MOW claims it would restrict open web competition and impair fraud detection
  • An alliance of tech businesses, advertisers and publishers has lodged a formal complaint with the Unione europea al di sopra di Google‘s next generation of its controversial digital advertising system.

    Il gruppo, Movement for an Open Web (MOW), claims the new system, which will be an overhaul of how adverts work on the Chrome browser, is hugely anti-competitive.

    Google is planning to replace so-called third party cookies with a new ‘Privacy Sandbox’. It means that instead of these traditional cookies, where advertisers can track individuals across the websites they visit, users will be split into cohorts.

    But MOW claims this would restrict open web competition by reducing the amount of information other tech, advertising and publishing firms can gather on users.

    MOW said the Privacy Sandbox will impair independent analytics, advertising, fraud detection, data services, performance optimisation and other open web features.

    It said the California firm will also increase the value of data it gets from sources uniquely available to it through integrated services such as search functions.

    Google is planning to replace so-called third party cookies with a new 'Privacy Sandbox'. The company's headquarters at Mountain View in California are pictured

    Google is planning to replace so-called third party cookies with a new ‘Privacy Sandbox’. The company’s headquarters at Mountain View in California are pictured

    MOW’s complaint, which was filed last week, follows another it made in November 2020 to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority.

    This saw Google respond in June this year by offering a series of ‘commitmentswhich placed the development of the Privacy Sandbox under the CMA’s supervision.

    What are the remedies offered by MOW to the European Commission?

    Movement for an Open Web has provided the European Commission with a series of potential remedies relating to Google’s technology changes. These remedies are:

    • ‘Google providing the EU with oversight of Google’s planned browser changes – enabling privacy and competition assessments to be made by the EU and data protection authorities in line with Google’s proposed remedy to the UK’s Competition and Market Authority and Information Commissioner’s Office
    • ‘Obligation on Google to notify the EU in advance of all anticompetitive browser changes and similar measures
    • ‘Google to introduce a certified compliance programme similar to that required of public corporations in the United States under the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation which requires regular independent audit and personal verification by Google management of compliance
    • ‘Regular qualitative reviews by the EU in parallel with the CMA and market testing of the competitive impact of proposed changes
    • ‘Oversight by data protection authorities is also needed to examine and satisfy themselves that privacy is being protected, and not merely being asserted by Google
    Annuncio pubblicitario

    Oggi, MOW said it has provided the European Commission with evidence of Google’s technology changes and how they impact choice and competition.

    MOW added that it has outlined potential remedies and wants the EU to promote independent data management to allow increased privacy and diversity.

    These remedies include Google providing the EU with oversight of its planned browser changes, and an obligation to notify the EU in advance of all ‘anti-competitive browser changes’.

    It also wants Google to introduce a certified compliance programme requiring regular independent audit and personal verification of compliance by Google management.

    Two other remedies are regular qualitative reviews by the EU in parallel with the CMA, and oversight by data protection authorities to satisfy themselves that privacy is being protected.

    James Rosewell, director of MOW, ha detto oggi: ‘The internet was originally envisaged as an open environment outside the control of any single body.

    ‘Google maintains it is making these changes to protect privacy but if not properly policed, the move threatens digital media, online privacy and innovation. Solutions aligned to lawsnot self-serving misuse of the web architecture by the members of Big Tech such as Googleare needed.

    ‘More people, surrendering more personal data to fewer companies doesn’t improve anyone’s privacy while stifling competition and boosting their huge profits even further.

    Tim Cowen, chair of the antitrust practice at law firm Preiskel & Co in London and a legal advisor to MOW, aggiunto: ‘We’re asking that the EU Commission create a level playing field for all digital businesses, to maintain and protect an open web. Google says they’re strengthening ‘privacyfor end users but they’re notwhat they’re really proposing is a creepy data mining party.

    MOW, previously called Marketers for an Open Web, is an alliance of leading tech, advertising, and publishing firms campaigning to maintain open web competition.

    The new system will be a major overhaul of how ads work on Google's Chrome browser

    The new system will be a major overhaul of how ads work on Google’s Chrome browser

    Separatamente, Google’s lawyers are this week fighting a £3.7billion anti-trust EU fine following deals it made with Android phone makers regarding search functionality.

    Google has not yet responded to a request for comment by MailOnline today, but did make a series of commitments to the CMA in June.

    Al tempo, Google committed to develop and implement the new changes in a way that does not distort competition or imposes unfair terms on users of Chrome.

    The company has also promised increased transparency on how and when it will implement its new proposals and how it will assess them.

    It said there would be no data advantage for Google advertising products under its proposals, and its products or own sites would not have preferential treatment.

    I commenti sono chiusi.